On 21 June 2012, the Constitutional Court adopted a judgment in the case No. 2011-20-01 “On Compliance of Section 20 (1) Indent 1 of the Law on State Social Allowances” with Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia”. The term “full State support” in each individual case shall be […]
On 8 June 2011, the Constitutional Court adopted a decision to terminate legal proceedings in the case No. 2011-18-01 “On Compliance of Section 162 (4) and Section 19 (5) of the Law “On Budget and Financial Management” with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 87 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia”. Contested Norms Section […]
On 8 June 2012, the First Panel of the Constitutional Court initiated a case “On Compliance of Para 841 and 89 of the 31 October 2006 Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No. 899 “Procedures for the Reimbursement of Expenditures for the Acquisition of Medicinal Products and Medicinal Devices Intended for Out-patient Medical Treatment” with Article 91[1] […]
On 8 June 2012, the First Panel of the Constitutional Court initiated a case “On Compliance of Section 483 insofar as It Establishes the Right of the Chairperson of the Senate Civil Matters Department to submit a protest with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia[1]”. Contested Norm Section 483 of the […]
On 7 June 2012, the Constitutional Court adopted a judgment in the case No. 2011-19-01 “On Compliance of Section 6 (2) Indent 4 of the Law on the Rights of Landowners to Compensation for Restrictions on Economic Activities in Specially Protected Nature Territories and Microreserves with the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 105 […]
On 6 June 2012, the Constitutional Court adopted a judgment in the case No. 2011-21-01 “On Compliance of Section 8 (2) of the Law on Compensation for Losses Caused by State Administration Institutions with the Third Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia”. On the positive commitment of the State […]
On 9 May 2012, the First Panel of the Constitutional Court initiated a case “On Compliance of Section 50 (1) of the Education Law with Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia[1]”. Contested Norm Section 50 (1) of the Education Law provides that a person who has been punished for an intentional […]
On 9 May 2012, the Second Panel of the Constitutional Court initiated a case “On Compliance of the Words “but not Later than within Five Years after Coming into Effect of the Unlawful Administrative Act issued by the Institution or the Date of having Performed the Illicit Factual Action” of Section 17 of the Law […]
On 16 May 2012, the First Panel of the Constitutional Court initiated a case “On Compliance of the Words “up to 31 December 2011” of Para 41 of Transitional Provisions of the Law “On State Pensions” with Article 91.[1] and 109.[2] of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia”. Contested Norm Para 41 of Transitional Provisions of […]
On 2 May 2012, the Constitutional Court adopted a judgment in the case No. 2011-17-03 “On Compliance of Section 3 and 4 of 10 May 2005 Cabinet of Minister Regulation No. 312 “Regulations regarding the Amount of the Blank Tape Levy and the Levy of Equipment Used for Reproduction and the Procedures for the Collection, […]
