Search

On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 400(1) and the First and the Third Part of Section (405) of Civil Procedure Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-93-01

On Compliance of Section 5(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012 with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-44-01

On Compliance of Section 3(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012, Insofar It Applies to the State Old-age Pension, with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-43-01

On Compliance of Section 5(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012 with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-44-01

On Compliance of Section 5(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012 with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-44-01

On Compliance of Section 5(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012 with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-44-01

On Compliance of Section 5(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012 with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-44-01

The Compliance of the Words in the First Sentence of Paragraph 1 of the Transitional Provisions of the Citizenship Law "if the Registration Takes Place by 1 July, 1995" and of the Second Sentence with Article 1 and 2 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, as well as with the Preamble of 4 May 1990 Declaration of the Supreme Council of Latvian S.S.R. "On the Restoration of the Independence of the Republic of Latvia"

On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 400 (1) and the First and Third Part of Section 405 of Civil Procedure Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the Section 400 (1) Indent 1 and Section 405 (1) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Law comply with Article 92 of the Satversme if a debtor is sent a warning on undisputed compulsory execution of obligations prior to launching of it.

On Compliance of Section 3(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012, Insofar It Applies to the State Old-age Pension, with Article 1, Article 91, Article 105 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-43-01

On Compliance of Section 3(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012, Insofar It Applies to Service Pension, Which Has Been Granted in Compliance with By-law “On the Rank and File and the Unit Commanding Personnel of the Institutions of the Ministry of the Interior Employee Pensions (Employer Pensions)”, with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-43-01

On Compliance of Annex 1 to the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation of 19 December 2006 No. 1022 "Regulations on Norms Regarding Nourishment and Material Provision of Everyday Needs" with Article 111 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-69-03

On Compliance of the Sub-programme 21.06.00 of Law On State Budget for 2009 with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and of the Compliance of Para 26 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation of 15 April 2008 "Regulations on Financial Assistance Quotas for Biofuel" with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-42-0103

On Compliance of Para 14, Para 16 and Para 17 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law "On Long Service Pensions of Military Persons" with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held:
1. Para 14 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Long Service Pensions for Military Persons”, insofar as it applies to persons who have received the age of granting old age pension established in the Law “On State Pensions” does not comply with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and shall be regarded as null and void as from the moment of adoption thereof.
2. According deductions of long service pensions of military persons who have reached the age of granting of old age pension established in the Law “On State Pensions” made under Para 14 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Long Service Pensions for Military Persons” shall be terminated no later than by 1 June 2010.
3. The Saeima shall be committed to establishing, no later than by 1 June 2010, procedure for disbursing deductions from long service pensions of military persons who have reached the age of granting of old age pension established in the Law “On State Pensions” made under Para 14 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Long Service Pensions for Military Persons”.
4. Proceedings regarding compliance of Para 16 and Para 17 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Long Service Pensions for Military Persons” with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme shall be terminated.

On Compliance of Section 3(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012, Insofar It Applies to Service Pension, Which Has Been Granted in Compliance with By-law “On the Rank and File and the Unit Commanding Personnel of the Institutions of the Ministry of the Interior Employee Pensions (Employer Pensions)”, with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-43-01

On Compliance of Para 8 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law on Long Service Pensions for Public Prosecutors with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held:
1. Para 8 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law on Long Service Pension of Public Prosecutors does not comply with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia as from the date of adoption thereof.
2. Deductions from the long service pensions made in accordance with Para 8 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law on Long Service Pension of Public Prosecutors shall be ceased and reimbursed no later than before 1 June 2010.
3. No later than before 1 June 2010, the Saeima shall have the duty to establish a procedure, according to which the deductions made in accordance with Para 8 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law on Long Service Pension of Public Prosecutors will be reimbursed.

On Compliance of Section 141(1) of Civil Procedure Law, Insofar It Establishes the Right to Submit an Ancillary Complaint Regarding a Decision Satisfying an Application on Securing of a Claim, with Article 91, Article 92 and Article 105 of the Satversme

Constitutional Court held:
1. Section 141 Paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Law insofar as it does not grant the right to submit an ancillary complaint regarding a decision satisfying an application on securing a claim or a decision rejecting an application to cancel the security of the claim does not comply with Article 92 of the Satversme.
2. In relation to the Applicants, the joint stock company “TOPMAR HOLDINGS” and Mr. Vitālijs Grinčišins, Section 141 Paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Law insofar as it does not grant the right to submit an ancillary complaint regarding a decision satisfying an application for securing a claim shall be null and void from the moment of adoption thereof.
3. Up to the moment when the Saeima introduces amendments to the normative regulation as ruled herein, the wording of Section 141 Paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Law of 14 December 2006 shall be in force insofar as it grants the defendant the right to submit an ancillary complaint regarding the decision rejecting to cancel the security of a claim.

On Compliance of Section 3(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012, Insofar It Applies to the State Old-age Pension, with Article 1, Article 91, Article 105 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-43-01

On Compliance of Section 3(1) of Law On Payment of State Allowances during the Time Period from 2009 to 2012, Insofar It Applies to the State Old-age Pension, with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2009-43-01