Search

Filter results

  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2009-93-01
On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 400 (1) and the First and Third Part of Section 405 of Civil Procedure Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Dzintars Lejnieks, Māris Rudzītis, Santa Pole, Indars Lieģis un Edijs Lieģis
17.05.2010.

20.05.2010.

On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 400 (1) and the First and Third Part of Section 405 of Civil Procedure Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the Section 400 (1) Indent 1 and Section 405 (1) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Law comply with Article 92 of the Satversme if a debtor is sent a warning on undisputed compulsory execution of obligations prior to launching of it.