News

2025
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
01.10.2013.

A Case Initiated Regarding the Prohibition to Border-guards to Unite in Trade Unions

On 1 October 2013 the 1st Panel of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia initiated case “On compliance of the words “joining in trade unions” of Section”49(1) of Border Guard Law with Article 102 and the second sentence of Article 108 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.” Contested Norm (in italics) […]

19.08.2013.

Case Regarding Compensations to Owners of Properties Located in Nature Reserves

On 16 August 2013 the 2nd Panel of the Constitutional Court initiated case “On the Compliance of Para 8 of Transitional Provisions of Law on the Conservation of Species and Biotopes with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.” Contested Norm The contested norm provides that the compensation for […]

03.06.2013.

The Constitutional Court refuses to initiate a case regarding the potential extradition of a Latvian citizen

On 31 May the Constitutional Court adopted a decision to refuse to initiate a case with regard to the constitutional complaints submitted by Deniss Čalovskis. The applicant had contested the constitutionality of a number of norms that regulate extradition of a person. Čalovskis had requested to declare anti-constitutional the international agreement “Treaty on Extradition between […]

22.04.2013.

The Constitutional Court has proposed to the Cabinet of Ministers to Postpone Deciding on the Extradition of a Latvian Citizen to a Foreign State  

On 12 April this year the Constitutional Court received Deniss Čalovskis’ constitutional complaints, which contain, inter alia, the request to suspend enforcement of the decision adopted by the Chamber of Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court, i.e., the request to suspend the extradition of the applicant to a foreign state – the United States of […]

15.04.2013.

The Norm on Reduction of a Fine in Tax Matters is Incompatible with the Satversme

On 15 April 2013 the Constitutional Court passed the judgement in Case No. 2012-18-01 “On Compliance of Words included in Section 333 (1) of the Law “On Taxes and Fees” “if the taxpayer agrees to the additional amount of estimated tax, fee or other State-established payment [including a late charge that is calculated for the period […]

Cookies

For the website to function, mandatory cookies are used.

Analytics Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Social media cookies

With your consent, social media cookies may additionally be used on this website. These cookies are set by other companies whose functionality is used by the website.