The norm that restricts the right to reimbursement of the State duty in civil procedure by the term of three years is incompatible with the first sentence of Article 91 of the Satversme
On 2 November 2020, the Constitutional Court delivered the judgement in case No. 2020-14-01 “On Compliance of Section 37 (3) of the Civil Procedure Law with the first sentence of Article 91 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia”. The Contested Norm Section 37 (2) of the Civil Procedure Law “The State duty shall be reimbursed provided that an […]



