Search
Filter results
- Years
- 1
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 1
- More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2017-25-01
On Compliance of Para 6 of Section 5 of The Saeima Election Law with Article 1, Article 9 and Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Tatjana Ždanoka
Show all
On Compliance of Para 6 of Section 5 of The Saeima Election Law with Article 1, Article 9 and Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: Restrictions on the Voting Rights IIIThe Constitutional Court held:
to recognise Para 6 of Section 5 of The Saeima Election Law as being compatible with Article 1, Article 9 and Article 91 of the Satversme.
-
The norm of The Saeima Election Law that prohibits from running for the election persons, who after 13 January 1991 had been active in certain organisations, in appropriate interpretation of it, complies with the Satversme
-
A case initiated with respect to a norm in The Saeima Election Law that prohibits from including in the list of candidates and elect into the Saeima persons, who after 13 January 1991 had been active in certain organisations