Search

Filter results

  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2022-31-03
On Compliance of Para 3 of Table 4 of Annex 1 and Para 7 of Annex 3 of the Cabinet Regulation of 5 July 2016 No. 445 “Regulations Regarding Remuneration of Teachers” with the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Jānis Vucāns, Edgars Kucins, Evija Papule, Gundars Daudze, Armands Krauze, Uldis Augulis, Māris Možvillo, Raimonds Bergmanis, Janīna Jalinska, Ļubova Švecova, Māris Kučinskis, Jānis Dūklavs, Karina Sprūde, Jūlija Stepaņenko, Edgars Tavars, Viktors Valainis, Ralfs Nemiro, Inga Šuplinska, Inguna Rībena, Romāns Naudiņš, Ēriks Pucens, Ivans Ribakovs, Jānis Urbanovičs, Jānis Krišāns, Vitālijs Orlovs, Zenta Tretjaka, Ivans Klementjevs, Andrejs Klementjevs, Didzis Šmits, Inga Goldberga, Sergejs Dolgopolovs, Nikolajs Kabanovs, Boriss Cilevičs, Vladimirs Nikonovs, Igors Pimenovs, Jānis Tutins, Valērijs Agešins un Artūrs Rubiks
Show all
29.06.2023.

-

On Compliance of Para 3 of Table 4 of Annex 1 and Para 7 of Annex 3 of the Cabinet Regulation of 5 July 2016 No. 445 “Regulations Regarding Remuneration of Teachers” with the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

The Constitutional Court held:
1. To recognise the third, fourth and fifth part of Section 56 of the law “On Higher Education Institutions”, insofar they apply to higher education institutions and faculty members thereof, as being incompatible with Article 112 and Article 113 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and void as of 1 July 2024.
2. To recognise Section 56 (3) of the law “On Higher Education Institutions” (in the wording, which was in force from 1 May 2021 until 10 October ), insofar this provision applies to higher education institutions and faculty members thereof, are incompatible with Article 112 and Article 113 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

2022-31-03_Judgement
2022-31-03_Separate opinion_Kusins 2022-31-03_Separate opinion_Neimanis