Search
Filter results
- Years
- 1
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 1
- More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2020-43-0106
On Compliance of Sub-para 32.4. and 36.2. of “Annex to the Law on Administrative Territories and Populated Areas “Administrative Territories, Administrative Centres thereof and the Units of Territorial Division”” with Article 1 and the First Sentence of the Second Part Article 101 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and the Sixth Part of Article 4 as well as Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Government
Adjudicated
Inčukalna novada dome; Varakļānu novada dome; Garkalnes novada dome
Show all
On Compliance of Sub-para 32.4. and 36.2. of “Annex to the Law on Administrative Territories and Populated Areas “Administrative Territories, Administrative Centres thereof and the Units of Territorial Division”” with Article 1 and the First Sentence of the Second Part Article 101 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and the Sixth Part of Article 4 as well as Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Government
-
The joining of the Varakļāni Region to the Rēzekne Region is incompatible with the Satversme but the inclusion of the rural municipality of Inčukalns into the Sigulda Region and the inclusion of the rural municipality of Garkalne and the town of Vangaži into the Ropaži Region comply with the Satversme
-
A case initiated with respect to the joining of the rural municipality of Vangaži to the Ropaži Region and of the rural municipality of Inčukalns to the Sigulda Region