Search
Filter results
- Years
- 1
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 1
- More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2018-16-03
On Compliance of Para 91, Para 92, Para 98 and Para 99, and Para 2 of Annex 9 of the Cabinet Regulation of 10 March 2009 No. 221 “Regulations Regarding Electricity Production and Price Determination upon Production of Electricity in Cogeneration” and of the last sentence of Para 63. 8, Para 106, Para 107, Para 113 and Para 114, and Para 2 of Annex 10 with Article 64 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Divdesmit Saeimas deputāti: Ivars Zariņš; Jeļena Lazareva; Jānis Tutins; Andris Morozovs; Vitālijs Orlovs; Boriss Cilevičs; Jānis Urbanovičs; Sergejs Potapkins; Ivans Ribakovs; Raimonds Rubiks; Aleksandrs Jakimovs; Ivans Klementjevs; Sergejs Mirskis; Igors Zujevs; Romans Miloslavskis; Sergejs Dolgopolovs; Artūrs Rubiks; Jānis Ādamsons; Mihails Zemļinskis un Andrejs Klementjevs.
Show all
On Compliance of Para 91, Para 92, Para 98 and Para 99, and Para 2 of Annex 9 of the Cabinet Regulation of 10 March 2009 No. 221 “Regulations Regarding Electricity Production and Price Determination upon Production of Electricity in Cogeneration” and of the last sentence of Para 63. 8, Para 106, Para 107, Para 113 and Para 114, and Para 2 of Annex 10 with Article 64 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: Overcompensation calculation for the mandatory procurement of electricity-
The norms of the Cabinet Regulation on the implementation of the mandatory electricity procurement – control of self-consumption and calculation of overcompensation – comply with Article 64 of the Satversme
-
A case initiated with regard to norms that regulate the calculation of overcompensation and control of self-consumption for producers of electricity, who receive state support in the form of mandatory electricity procurement