Search

Filter results

  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2010-39-01
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Section 20 of Law On the Judicial Power (in the Wording of 16 June 2009) and the Third Sentence thereof (in the Wording of 1 December 2009,) Insofar as They Establish Remuneration of Land Registry Office Judges, with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Žanna Zujeva, Ilga Neimane, Ligita Vecauziņa, Liāna Liepiņa, Gita Grišāne, Sandra Breča, Agnese Skulme, Ilze Ieviņa, Ieva Zabarovska, Ilze Ieviņa, Kristīne Ozoliņa, Inese Kazjonova, Irēna Lavrinoviča, Una Melameda, Baiba Strauta, Smaida Grava, Inese Punte, Dainida Sarma, Ināra Jaunzeme, Ināra Zariņa, Dainis Šaicāns, Mairita Zadiņa, Māra Balode, Everita Ancāne, Antra Tiltiņa un Ināra Zabarovska
14.12.2010.

16.12.2010.

On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Section 20 of Law On the Judicial Power (in the Wording of 16 June 2009) and the Third Sentence thereof (in the Wording of 1 December 2009,) Insofar as They Establish Remuneration of Land Registry Office Judges, with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the second sentence of Para 20 of Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Judicial Power” and the words “salary of judges shall be calculated at the amount of 73 percent of the labour wage established in accordance with Para 17 of the Transitional Provisions” insofar as they establish remuneration of Land Registry Office judges, do comply with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme provided that from 1 January 2011 salaries would be calculated and disbursed in accordance with Section120.1 of the Law “On Judicial Power” as ruled in the Judgment of 18 January 2010 by the Constitutional Court in the case No. 2009-11-01.