Search

On Compliance of the Words ”in Paragraph Three” Included in the Fourth Paragraph of Section 449 of Civil Procedure Law and Note to Section 98 of Land Register Law with Section 92 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme

Constitutional Court ruled:
1. To declare the words ”and in the third Paragraph”, included in Section 449 (the fourth Paragraph) and Nota Bene of Section 98 of the Land Book Law as unconformable with Section 92 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void from July 1, 2006.
2. To determine that till July 1, 2006 in the category of these cases the general principle of civil procedural rights, which has been fixed in Section 43 (the fourth Paragraph) and Section 458 (the fourth Paragraph) of the Civil Procedure Law, shall be applied by procedural analogy.
3. To determine that the submitter of the constitutional complaint – Oļegs Kožečenkovs – experiences the right of appealing against the Civil Court Panel of the Supreme Court February 10, 2005 resolution and request to completely or partly exempt him from the payment of the State duty.