On Compliance of Para 5 and Para 6 of Section 5 of The Saeima Election Law and Para 5 and Para 6 of Section 9 (1) of the Law on Elections of the Municipal Council, County Council and Parish Council with Articles 1, 9, 91 and 101 of the Saeima of Republic of Latvia, as well as with Articles 25 and 26 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Case short name: Restrictions of the Election Right IIConstitutional Court ruled:
1. To declare that Section 5, Items 5 and 6 of the Saeima Election Law and Section 9, Items 5 and 6 of the first Paragraph of the City Dome, Region Dome and Rural District Council Election Law complies with Sections 1, 9, 91 and 101 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and Sections 25 and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
2. To declare that with regard to the submitter of the constitutional complaint Juris Bojārs Section 5, Item 5 of the Saeima Election Law and Section 9, Item 6 of the first Paragraph of the City Dome, Region Dome and Rural District Council are unconformable with Sections 1, 9, 91 and 101 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme as well as with Sections 25 and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and shall lose validity from the day of publishing of the Judgment.