On Compliance of the Third Sentence of Section 77(7) of Latvian Criminal Procedure Code with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Court ruled to declare Article 77 (the third sentence of the seventh part) of the Criminal Procedure Code as unconformable with Article 92 of the Satversme and null and void as of October 1, 2003 if the procedure for insurance of realization of the right of the defendant to be heard out is not determined by the law.