Search
Filter results
- Years
- 1
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 1
- More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2019-35-01
On Compliance of Section 61 (8) and Section 63 (7) of Immigration Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Igors Lakatošs
Show all
On Compliance of Section 61 (8) and Section 63 (7) of Immigration Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: Appeal against the Entry ban adopted by the Minister of InteriorThe Constitutional Court held:
1. To recognise Section 61 (8) of the Immigration Law as being incompatible with the first sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and void as of 1 March 2021.
2. To terminate legal proceedings in the part of the case with respect to the compliance of Section 63 (7) of the Immigration Law with the first sentence of Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
-
The norm, which establishes the procedure for appealing against the decision on prohibiting a person from entering Latvia, is incompatible with the first sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
-
A case initiated with respect to norms of Immigration Law, which define the procedure for contesting and reviewing a decision on including a person in the list of those foreigners who are prohibited from entering the Republic of Latvia