Search
Filter results
- Years
- 1
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 1
- More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2004-21-01
On Compliance of Para 32 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
Adjudicated
Mārtiņš Draudiņš, Alberts Krols, Jevgēnija Borovska, Mārtiņš Skuja, Jānis Botmanis, Jānis Koponāns, Aivars Bērziņš, Astrīda Krakope, Raimonds Millers, Viktors Stepičevs, Mihails Bondarevs, Taisija Antmane, Alberts Beļajevs, Elga Akotiņa, Ivars Kārkliņš, Maija Ausekle, Eduards Šņukuts, Francis Buļs, Artūrs Elksnis, Almants Balodis un Elmārs Gultnieks
Show all
On Compliance of Para 32 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
Constitutional Court ruled to declare Paragraph 32 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law ”On State Pensions” as unconformable with Article 109 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void from the moment when Paragraph 26 of the Transitional Provisions of the Pension Law lost effect, that is, from March 20, 2002.
