Search
Filter results
- Years
- 1
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 1
- More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2001-12-01
On Compliance of Para 26 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Mārtiņš Draudiņš, Valdis Eglītis un Viktors Purmalis
Show all
On Compliance of Para 26 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Constitutional Court decided to declare Paragraph 26 of the Pension Law Transitional Provisions as unconformable with Article 1 of the Satversme and null and void from the day of publishing the Judgment.
