Search

Filter results

  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
Results: 1
Case No 2024-21-0103
On the compliance of the words “four per cent” in the second sentence of Article 38(2) and of Article 42(7) of the law “On the Time Period of Coming into Force and the Procedures for the Application of the Introduction, Parts on Inheritance Rights and Property Rights of the Renewed Civil Law of 1937 of the Republic of Latvia” with Article 1 and the first and third sentences of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Nozīmēta tiesas sēde
Gabriela Diāna Kaplāne; Uri Traub; Brigita Anna Muške; SIA “Lansija”; Rasmus Māris Jāvalds; Žanete Aščuka; Artūrs Solozemnieks; Uģis Eriņš; SIA “LansiMed”
24.07.2024.
24.02.2025.
25.09.2025.
15.10.2025.
-

-

On the compliance of the words “four per cent” in the second sentence of Article 38(2) and of Article 42(7) of the law “On the Time Period of Coming into Force and the Procedures for the Application of the Introduction, Parts on Inheritance Rights and Property Rights of the Renewed Civil Law of 1937 of the Republic of Latvia” with Article 1 and the first and third sentences of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2024-21-0103

Cookies

For the website to function, mandatory cookies are used.

Analytics Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Social media cookies

With your consent, social media cookies may additionally be used on this website. These cookies are set by other companies whose functionality is used by the website.