Search

Filter results

  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
Results: 1
Case No 2023-10-03
On Compliance of Paragraph 3 of the Jūrmala City Council Binding Regulation No. 37 of 11 October 2012 "On the Procedure for Granting Property Tax Relief" with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Senāts
11.07.2024.

15.07.2024.

On Compliance of Paragraph 3 of the Jūrmala City Council Binding Regulation No. 37 of 11 October 2012 "On the Procedure for Granting Property Tax Relief" with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

The Constitutional Court decided as follows:
1. It is hereby declared that Paragraph 3 of Binding Regulation of Jūrmala City Council No. 37 of 11 October 2012, Regarding the Procedures for Granting Immovable Property Tax Reliefs, fails to conform to Article 91 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia.
2. In respect of the individuals who have initiated the protection of their fundamental rights by means of general judicial remedies, Paragraph 3 of Binding Regulation of Jūrmala City Council No. 37 of 11 October 2012, Regarding the Procedures for Granting Immovable Property Tax Reliefs, is hereby declared as non-conforming to Article 91 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia and therefore shall become invalid from the moment of the infringement of the fundamental rights of the respective individuals.

Cookies

For the website to function, mandatory cookies are used.

Analytics Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Social media cookies

With your consent, social media cookies may additionally be used on this website. These cookies are set by other companies whose functionality is used by the website.