On the compliance of Section 124(6) and (7), Section 125(3) and Section 126(31) of the Criminal Procedure Law with the first and second sentences of Section 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Vitālijs Leškovs (Vitaly Leshkov); Žanna Salmana (Zhanna Shalman); Lireva Investments Limited; Vladislavs Ickovskis (Vladyslav Itskovskyy); Fortress Finance Inc.; Janīna Filatova (Yanina Filatova); Andrejs Sizovs (Andrey Sizov); Veronika Ribaļčenko (Veronika Rybalchenko); AS ASG Resolution Capital; Persona N; Persona O; SIA “SUNHOUSE”; Rana Malikova (Rana Malikova); Murads Melikovs (Murad Melikov); KASPIANLAB LP; ASG Resolution Capital, AS, ASG Resolution Capital, AS; Ekonomisko lietu tiesa
Show all
14.03.2025.
17.03.2025.
On the compliance of Section 124(6) and (7), Section 125(3) and Section 126(31) of the Criminal Procedure Law with the first and second sentences of Section 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
the Constitutional Court decided:
1. To dismiss court proceedings in the part of the case concerning the compliance of Section 124(7) of the Criminal Procedure Law to the first and second sentences of Section 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia.
2. To terminate the proceedings in the part of the case concerning the compliance of Section 124(6), Section 125(3) and Section 126(31) of the Criminal Procedure Law with the second sentence of Section 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia.
3. To recognise that Section 124(6), Section 125(3) and Section 126(31) of the Criminal Procedure Law, insofar as these norms are applied in proceedings on criminally acquired property separated from criminal proceedings pursuant to Section 195(3) of the Criminal Law regarding autonomous money laundering, comply with the first sentence of Section 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia.
