Search

Filter results

  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
Results: 1
Case No 2020-59-01
On Compliance of Section 7.1 (3) of the Road Traffic Law with the First, Second and Third Sentence of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Augstākā tiesa
07.10.2021.

08.10.2021.

On Compliance of Section 7.1 (3) of the Road Traffic Law with the First, Second and Third Sentence of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

The Constitutional Court resolved:

1. To declare Section 7.1, Paragraph Three of the Road Traffic Law, insofar as it does not provide for individual assessment in cases where there is an objective necessity to relocate a road engineering structure or a technical means of traffic organisation, non-compliant with the first, second and third sentences of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

2. In respect of the applicant in administrative case No. A420194117 and other persons who have initiated protection of their fundamental rights by means of general legal remedies, in cases where the conditions set out in Clause 1 of ruling part of this Judgement exist, to declare Section 7.1, Paragraph Three of the Road Traffic Law non-compliant with the first, second and third sentences of Article 105 of the Satversme and invalid from the moment of the infringement of the fundamental rights of those persons.

Cookies

For the website to function, mandatory cookies are used.

Analytics Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Social media cookies

With your consent, social media cookies may additionally be used on this website. These cookies are set by other companies whose functionality is used by the website.