Search

Filter results

  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 1
  • More
Results: 1
Case No 2009-93-01
On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 400 (1) and the First and Third Part of Section 405 of Civil Procedure Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Dzintars Lejnieks, Māris Rudzītis, Santa Pole, Indars Lieģis un Edijs Lieģis
17.05.2010.

20.05.2010.

On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 400 (1) and the First and Third Part of Section 405 of Civil Procedure Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the Section 400 (1) Indent 1 and Section 405 (1) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Law comply with Article 92 of the Satversme if a debtor is sent a warning on undisputed compulsory execution of obligations prior to launching of it.

Cookies

For the website to function, mandatory cookies are used.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie ensures the website's proper functioning by providing its basic functions. The website will not be able to function properly without these cookies.

Analytics Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Social media cookies

With your consent, social media cookies may additionally be used on this website. These cookies are set by other companies whose functionality is used by the website.