Search
Filter results
- Years
- 35
- 33
- 47
- 45
- 45
- 66
- 38
- 25
- 35
- 31
- 25
- 36
- 21
- 26
- 21
- 75
- 117
- 48
- 26
- 43
- 25
- 26
- 23
- 21
- 17
- 8
- 7
- 6
- 5
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 6
- 5
- 10
- 2
- 566
- 384
- 3
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 441
- 124
- 210
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 478
- 105
- 181
- 212
- More
On Compliance of Sections 1, 5, 6 and 12 of the Law of 29 September 2022 "Amendments to Education Law", insofar these introduce Para 102 into the Transitional Provisions of the Law, and compliance of Section 4(1) and Section 6 of the Law of 29 September 2022 "Amendments to General Education Law" with Article 1 and Article 114 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
The Constitutional Court held:
to recognise Sections 1, 5, 6 and 12 of the Law of 29 September 2022 “Amendments to Education Law”, insofar these introduce Para 102 into the Transitional Provisions of the Law, and of Section 4 (1) and Section 6 of the Law of 29 September 2002 “Amendments to General Education Law” as being compatible with Article 1, the first sentence of Article 112 and Article 114 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia.
On compliance of Articles 2 and 3 of the Law of September 22, 2022 "Amendments to the Animal Protection Law" with Article 1 and the first and third sentences of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2023-09-0106
On Compliance of Section 124, Paragraph six, Section 125, Paragraph three and Section 126, Paragraph 3.1 of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First and Second Sentences of Article 92 of the Satversme
Combined case: 2022-32-01
On Compliance of Section 3(1) of the law on State Pensions with the first sentence of Section 91 and Section 109 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
-
The Constitutional Court of Latvia terminates legal proceedings in the case on the norm which denies the right to old-age pension to those persons whose permanent place of residence is not in Latvia
-
The case has been initiated regarding the provision which denies the right to an old-age pension for the persons whose permanent place of residence at the time of applying for the pension is not in Latvia
On compliance of Articles 2 and 3 of the Law of September 22, 2022 "Amendments to the Animal Protection Law" with Article 1, the first and third sentences of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia and Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Combined case: 2023-09-0106
On Compliance of Paragraph 3 of the Jūrmala City Council Binding Regulation No. 37 of 11 October 2012 "On the Procedure for Granting Property Tax Relief" with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
The Constitutional Court decided as follows:
1. It is hereby declared that Paragraph 3 of Binding Regulation of Jūrmala City Council No. 37 of 11 October 2012, Regarding the Procedures for Granting Immovable Property Tax Reliefs, fails to conform to Article 91 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia.
2. In respect of the individuals who have initiated the protection of their fundamental rights by means of general judicial remedies, Paragraph 3 of Binding Regulation of Jūrmala City Council No. 37 of 11 October 2012, Regarding the Procedures for Granting Immovable Property Tax Reliefs, is hereby declared as non-conforming to Article 91 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia and therefore shall become invalid from the moment of the infringement of the fundamental rights of the respective individuals.
On Compliance of Section 2 and Section 3 of the Law “Amendments to the Animal Protection Law”, adopted 22 September 2022, with the Section 1 and Section 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
The Constitutional Court decided as follows:
to recognise that Sections 2 and 3 of the law of 22 September 2022 on “Amendments to the Animal Protection Law” comply with Section 1, the first and third sentences of Section 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia and Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
On the compliance of paragraph 58 of the transitional provisions of the Immigration Law with Article 1, the first sentence of Article 91 and Article 96 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, as well as with Article 4 of Protocol 4 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Combined case: 2023-04-0106
On the compliance of Paragraph 58 of the Transitional Provisions of the Immigration Law and Article 5 of the Law of September 22, 2022 "Amendments to the Immigration Law", insofar as Paragraph 8 of the first part of Article 24 of the Immigration Law is excluded, with Article 1, 91 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. to the first sentence of Article and Article 96
Combined case: 2023-04-0106
On Compliance of Paragraph 58 of Transitional Provisions of the Immigration Law with Article 1, the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2023-04-0106
On Compliance of Paragraph 58 of Transitional Provisions of the Immigration Law with Article 1, the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 96 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
The Constitutional Court held:
1. To terminate legal proceedings in the case in the part regarding compliance of Section 5 of the law of 22 September 2022 “Amendments to Immigration Law”, insofar Para 8 of Section 24 (1) of Immigration Law is deleted by it, with Article 1, the first sentence of Article 91, Article 96 of the Constitution and Article 4 of Protocol 4 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
2. To recognise Para 58 of Transitional Provisions of Immigration Law (in the wording that is in force since 20 April 2023) as being compatible with Article 1, the first sentence of Article 91, Article 96 of the Constitution and Article 4 of Protocol 4 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
On Compliance of Section 38, Paragraph two of the Law On the Time Period of Coming into Force and the Procedures for the Application of the Introduction, Parts on Inheritance Rights and Property Rights of the Renewed Civil Law of 1937 of the Republic of Latvia with the First Sentence of Article 91 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia and the Compliance of Section 38, Paragraphs One and Two of that Law with Article 1 and the First and Third Sentences of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, as well as the Compliance of Section 42, Paragraph Three of the Law On the Time Period of Coming into Force and the Procedures for the Application of the Introduction, Parts on Inheritance Rights and Property Rights of the Renewed Civil Law of 1937 of the Republic of Latvia with Article 1 and the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
On Compliance of Article 631, part three of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2022-40-01
On Compliance of Annex 7 to Cabinet Regulation No 935 of 18 December 2012, Regulations Regarding Felling of Trees in Forests”, insofar as it Reduces the Final Felling Diameter According to the Dominant Tree Species and Site Index, with Article 115 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
The Constitutional Court decided as follows:
1. It is hereby declared that Annex 7 to Cabinet Regulation No. 935 of 18 December 2012, Regulations Regarding Felling of Trees in Forests, insofar as it reduces the final felling diameter according to the dominant tree species and site index, fails to conform to Article 115 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia and therefore is no longer valid from the moment of its entry into force.
2. It is hereby determined that Annex 7 to Cabinet Regulation No. 935 of 18 December 2012, Regulations Regarding Felling of Trees in Forests, in the part declared as not conforming to Article 115 of the Constitution shall remain in force in the wording which was in force until 29 June 2022.
On Compliance of Section 9 (11), Sub-para 1 of Para 102 of Transitional Provisions of Education Law and of Sections 1, 5 and 6 of the Law of 29 September 2022 “Amendments to Education Law” with Article 1, the First Sentence of Article 112, and Article 114 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia”
The Constitutional Court held:
to recognise Section 9 (11), Sub-para 1 of Para 102 of Transitional Provisions of Education Law and Sections 1, 5 and 6 of the Law of 29 September 2022 “Amendments to Education Law” as being compatible with Article 1, the first sentence of Article 112, and Article 114 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia.
On Compliance of Section 48, Paragraph seven of the Electronic Communications Law with the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 105 of the Satversme
On Compliance of Section 124, Paragraph six and Section 126, Paragraph 3.1 of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First and Second Sentences of Article 92 of the Constitution
Combined case: 2022-32-01
On Compliance of Section 124, Paragraph six, Section 125, Paragraph three and Section 126, Paragraph 3.1 of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First and Second Sentences of Article 92 of the Satversme
Combined case: 2022-32-01
On Compliance of Section 4(2), Section 5(2) and (5) and Section 8(1) of the Law on the Prohibition of Exhibiting Items Glorifying the Soviet and Nazi Regimes and Their Dismantling in the Territory of the Republic of Latvia with Article 1 and Article 101 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
the Constitutional Court decided:
to declare the second paragraph of Section 4, the second and fifth paragraphs of Section 5 of the Law On the Prohibition of Exhibiting Objects Glorifying the Soviet and Nazi Regimes and the Dismantling Thereof in the Territory of the Republic of Latvia and the first paragraph of Section 8(1) as compatible with Article 1 and the first sentence of the second paragraph of Article 101 of the Constitution.