Search

Filter results

  • Years
  • 1
  • 45
  • 45
  • 66
  • 38
  • 25
  • 35
  • 31
  • 25
  • 36
  • 21
  • 26
  • 21
  • 75
  • 117
  • 48
  • 26
  • 43
  • 25
  • 26
  • 23
  • 21
  • 17
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • More
  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 14
  • 13
  • 3
  • 515
  • 314
  • 3
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • 396
  • 117
  • 210
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 437
  • 91
  • 122
  • 212
  • More
Results: 862
Print
Case No 2022-05-01
On Complianceof Section 43 (4) of the Civil Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
In Adjudication
IMEX PROVIDER LTD
11.02.2022.
11.07.2022.
04.10.2022.
17.01.2023.

-

On Complianceof Section 43 (4) of the Civil Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2022-04-01
On compliance of the first and the second part of Section 38 of the law “On the Date of Coming into Force and Application of the Introduction, the Chapter on Inheritance Law and the Chapter of Property Law of the Restored Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia of 1937” with Article 1 and Article 91, as well as the first and the third sentence of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and compliance of Section 42 (3) of the law “On the Date of Coming into Force and Application of the Introduction, the Chapter on Inheritance Law and the Chapter of Property Law of the Restored Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia of 1937” with Article 1 and the first sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Joined
Žanete Aščuka
31.01.2022.
30.06.2022.
-
-

-

On compliance of the first and the second part of Section 38 of the law “On the Date of Coming into Force and Application of the Introduction, the Chapter on Inheritance Law and the Chapter of Property Law of the Restored Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia of 1937” with Article 1 and Article 91, as well as the first and the third sentence of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and compliance of Section 42 (3) of the law “On the Date of Coming into Force and Application of the Introduction, the Chapter on Inheritance Law and the Chapter of Property Law of the Restored Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia of 1937” with Article 1 and the first sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2022-02-01

Case No 2022-03-01
On Complinace of Section 534, 5341, 535, 536 and 537 with the first sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
In Adjudication
Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību “VZAIMNIJ KREDIT”
25.01.2022.
25.08.2022.
04.10.2022.
24.01.2023.

-

On Complinace of Section 534, 5341, 535, 536 and 537 with the first sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2022-02-01
On compliance of the first and the second part of Section 38, as well as of Section 42 (1) of the law “On the Date of Coming into Force and Application of the Introduction, the Chapter on Inheritance Law and the Chapter of Property Law of the Restored Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia of 1937” with Article 1 and Article 91, as well as the first and the third sentence of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Prepared
Gabriela Diana Kaplāne; Žanete Aščuka; Ēriks Jaunzems; Aivars Zeltiņš; Sarmīte Zeltiņa; Inga Zeltiņa; SIA “LansiMed”; Iveta Šēnhofa; Uldis Mežsēts; Inta Lapiņa; Mārtiņš Berlands; Zigrīda Buša; Līga Žimante; Anita Trapāne; Ruta Kalniņa; Ilmārs Tilgaļs; Ilze Eris; Kaspars Brūvers; Inese Tilgale; Nikola Buša; Uģis Eriņš; Mārtiņš Korsaks
19.01.2022.
19.06.2022.
28.09.2022.
21.02.2023.

-

On compliance of the first and the second part of Section 38, as well as of Section 42 (1) of the law “On the Date of Coming into Force and Application of the Introduction, the Chapter on Inheritance Law and the Chapter of Property Law of the Restored Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia of 1937” with Article 1 and Article 91, as well as the first and the third sentence of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2022-11-01
On Compliance of the Third Part of Section 631 of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Joined
Ārvalstu komersants "1Dream OU"
06.01.2022.
06.06.2022.
-
-

-

On Compliance of the Third Part of Section 631 of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2021-44-01

Case No 2022-01-01
On Compliance of the Fourth and the Fifth Part of Section 627 of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
On Hold
Ārvalstu komersants "1Dream OU"; Deņs Sjaosju; Dzjiņa Liņa; Volodimirs Strijs (Volodimir Strij); Jeļena Glazera (Elena Glazer)
06.01.2022.
05.08.2022.
28.09.2022.
09.11.2022.

-

On Compliance of the Fourth and the Fifth Part of Section 627 of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-45-01
On compliance of Section 56(3), 56(4) and 56(5) of the Law on Institutions of Higher Education with Articles 105, 112 and 113 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Prepared
Valērijs Agešins, Edgars Kucins, Boriss Cilevičs, Ivans Klementjevs, Artūrs Rubiks, Jānis Tutins, Vladimirs Nikonovs, Igors Pimenovs, Ivars Zariņš, Regīna Ločmele, Inga Goldberga, Ivans Ribakovs, Vitālijs Orlovs, Jānis Krišāns, Andrejs Klementjevs, Ļubova Švecova, Jānis Urbanovičs, Sergejs Dolgopolovs, Nikolajs Kabanovs un Karina Sprūde
29.12.2021.
29.05.2022.
14.09.2022.
07.02.2023.

-

On compliance of Section 56(3), 56(4) and 56(5) of the Law on Institutions of Higher Education with Articles 105, 112 and 113 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-44-01
On compliance of the second sentence of Section 631(3) of the Criminal Procedure Law with the first sentence of Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
On Hold
Artjoms Zujevs; Ārvalstu komersants "1Dream OU"; Produktech Engineering AG; Baksodirs Boltabajevičs Parpijevs (Bakhodir Boltabayevich Parpiyev); Polaris Consulting Ltd
29.12.2021.
29.07.2022.
28.09.2022.
11.01.2023.

-

On compliance of the second sentence of Section 631(3) of the Criminal Procedure Law with the first sentence of Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-43-01
On compliance of Section 56(3), 56(4) and 56(5) of the Law on Institutions of Higher Education with Articles 105, 112 and 113 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Persona J
03.11.2022.

07.11.2022.

On compliance of Section 56(3), 56(4) and 56(5) of the Law on Institutions of Higher Education with Articles 105, 112 and 113 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-42-01
On Compliance of Section 500 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Persona I
02.12.2022.

05.12.2022.

On Compliance of Section 500 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-41-01
On Compliance of Para 3 of Section 55 of the Law “On Judicial Power” with the First Part of Article 101 and the First Sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Persona H
15.12.2022.

16.12.2022.

On Compliance of Para 3 of Section 55 of the Law “On Judicial Power” with the First Part of Article 101 and the First Sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-40-0103
On Compliance of Para 2 of Section 7 (4) of the Law on the Procedures for Holding Detained Persons” and Annex 4 to the Cabinet Regulation of 10 January 2006 No. 38 “Regulations regarding Nutritional Provision Norms and Provision Norms of Washing Products and Personal Hygiene Products for Persons Placed in a Short-term Place of Detention” with the Second Sentence of Article 95 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Administratīvā rajona tiesa
08.06.2022.

13.06.2022.

On Compliance of Para 2 of Section 7 (4) of the Law on the Procedures for Holding Detained Persons” and Annex 4 to the Cabinet Regulation of 10 January 2006 No. 38 “Regulations regarding Nutritional Provision Norms and Provision Norms of Washing Products and Personal Hygiene Products for Persons Placed in a Short-term Place of Detention” with the Second Sentence of Article 95 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-39-01
On Compliance of Sub-para “c” of Para 14 of Section 1 of the Value Added Tax Law, insofar it Applies to Cases of Compulsory Land Lease, with the First Sentence of Article 91 and the First, Second and Third Sentence of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Joined
AS “ZEMES ĪPAŠNIEKU ĢILDE”
08.10.2021.
08.03.2022.
26.04.2022.
-

-

On Compliance of Sub-para “c” of Para 14 of Section 1 of the Value Added Tax Law, insofar it Applies to Cases of Compulsory Land Lease, with the First Sentence of Article 91 and the First, Second and Third Sentence of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2020-24-01

Case No 2021-38-01
On Compliance of Para 31 of Section 529 (1) and Section 550 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Aivars Lembergs
14.04.2022.

19.04.2022.

On Compliance of Para 31 of Section 529 (1) and Section 550 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

The Constitutional Court ruled the following:
To recognise Section 529, Paragraph One, Clause 31 and Section 550, Paragraph One of the Criminal Procedure Law, insofar as it relates to the time limit for submitting an appeal in particularly complex and voluminous criminal proceedings, as being compatible with the first sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

Case No 2021-37-03
On compliance of paragraph 2418 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No 360 of 9 June 2020 ‘Epidemiological safety measures for the containment of the spread of COVID-19 infection’ (in the wording that was in force from 7 April 2021 until 19 May 2021) with the first sentence of Article 91, the first and the third sentence of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Joined
SIA „EfTEN Domina”
06.09.2021.
06.02.2022.
-
-

-

On compliance of paragraph 2418 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No 360 of 9 June 2020 ‘Epidemiological safety measures for the containment of the spread of COVID-19 infection’ (in the wording that was in force from 7 April 2021 until 19 May 2021) with the first sentence of Article 91, the first and the third sentence of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2021-24-03

Case No 2021-36-01
On Compliance of Para 2 of Section 7 1 (1) of the Law on Financing Political Organisations (Parties) with the first sentence of Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Politiskā partija “Mēs – Talsiem un novadam”
15.12.2022.

16.12.2022.

On Compliance of Para 2 of Section 7 1 (1) of the Law on Financing Political Organisations (Parties) with the first sentence of Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-35-03
On compliance of sub-paragraph 88.2 and paragraph 89 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No 78 of 7 February 2017 ‘Regulations regarding the trade and use of natural gas’ (in the wording that was in force until 24 January 2020) with Article 64 and the first and the third sentence of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia and with Section 107(7) of the Energy Law
Joined
Rīgas rajona tiesa
18.08.2021.
18.01.2022.
-
-

-

On compliance of sub-paragraph 88.2 and paragraph 89 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No 78 of 7 February 2017 ‘Regulations regarding the trade and use of natural gas’ (in the wording that was in force until 24 January 2020) with Article 64 and the first and the third sentence of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia and with Section 107(7) of the Energy Law

Combined case: 2021-03-03

Case No 2021-34-01
On the compliance of Section 82(1) of the Criminal Law in the wording which was in force from 1 April 2013 until 10 May 2016 with the first sentence of Article 100 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, and on the compliance of the transitional provision of the law of 21 April 2016 ‘Amendments to the Criminal Law’ with Article 1 and the second sentence of Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Deniss Barteckis
27.05.2022.

30.05.2022.

On the compliance of Section 82(1) of the Criminal Law in the wording which was in force from 1 April 2013 until 10 May 2016 with the first sentence of Article 100 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, and on the compliance of the transitional provision of the law of 21 April 2016 ‘Amendments to the Criminal Law’ with Article 1 and the second sentence of Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

The Constitutional Court resolved:
To terminate legal proceedings in Case No. 2021-34-01 “On Compliance of Section 82, Paragraph One of the Criminal Law in the Wording Effective from 1 April 2013 to 10 May 2016 with the First Sentence of Article 100 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and Compliance of the Transitional Provision of the Law “Amendments to the Criminal Law” of 21 April 2016 with Article 1 and the Second Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia”.

Case No 2021-33-0103
On compliance of paragraph 8 of Section 4(1) of the Law on the Management of the Spread of COVID-19 Infection, paragraphs 11 and 124 of Section 1 and paragraph 45 of Section 14 of the Education Law, as well as sub-paragraph 27.1.3, paragraph 327(2) and (3) of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No 360 of 9 June 2020 'Epidemiological Safety Measures for the Containment of the Spread of COVID-19 Infection’ with Article 112 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Markuss Kārkliņš; Timurs Jareško; Valērija Jareško; Nadežda Kadikova; Fjodors Kadikovs; Boriss Kadikovs; Luka Kadikovs
26.05.2022.

30.05.2022.

On compliance of paragraph 8 of Section 4(1) of the Law on the Management of the Spread of COVID-19 Infection, paragraphs 11 and 124 of Section 1 and paragraph 45 of Section 14 of the Education Law, as well as sub-paragraph 27.1.3, paragraph 327(2) and (3) of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No 360 of 9 June 2020 'Epidemiological Safety Measures for the Containment of the Spread of COVID-19 Infection’ with Article 112 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

Case No 2021-32-0103
On compliance of paragraph 10 of Section 13(1) of the Law on the Procedures for Holding under Arrest and of paragraph 10 of Annex 4 to the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No 800 of 27 November 2007 ‘Internal procedure regulations of investigation prisons’ with the first sentence of Article 101 and the first sentence of Article 106 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Aivars Lembergs
05.05.2022.

10.05.2022.

On compliance of paragraph 10 of Section 13(1) of the Law on the Procedures for Holding under Arrest and of paragraph 10 of Annex 4 to the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No 800 of 27 November 2007 ‘Internal procedure regulations of investigation prisons’ with the first sentence of Article 101 and the first sentence of Article 106 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

The Constitutional Court ruled the following:

To recognise Section 13, Paragraph One, Clause 10 of the Law on the Procedures for Holding under Arrest and Paragraph 10 of Annex 4 to Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 800 of 27 November 2007 “Internal Rules of Conduct of Investigation Prison” as being compatible with the first sentence of Article 101 and the first sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.