Search

On Compliance of the Words of Para 1 Section 7 (5) "the Height of Which Does not Exceed 1.2 Meters" of Law On the Procedures for Holding the Detained Persons" and Para 1 of Transitional Provisions Thereof with Article 1 and Article 95 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held::
1. The words of Section 7 (5) Indent 1 “by means of a wall, the height of which does not exceed 1.2 meters” of the Law “On Procedures for Keeping of Detained Persons” fail to comply with Article 95 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
2. Para 1 of Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Procedures for Keeping of Detained Persons” fail to comply with Article 95 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and shall become null and void as from 1 January 2012.

On Compliance of the Words in Section 396(1) of Civil Procedure Law "or the pledgee who has the right to sell the pledge on the open market", the Words in Section 396(2) "but if the application has been submitted by a pledgee – also a true copy of the pledge agreement, evidence regarding warning of the debtor, unless it does not follow from the law that such warning is required", the Words in Section 397(1) "without notifying the applicant and the debtor thereof", and the words in Para 1 of Section 397(2)"the immovable property is owned by the submitter of the application or by a debtor of a pledgee and the pledgee has the right to sell the immovable property on the open market" with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Section 6 of the Law of 1 December 2009 "Amendments to Law On Personal Income Tax" (in the Part on Deleting Para 3 of Section 9(1) of Law on Personal Income Tax) and of Para 13 of Section 8(3) and Section 16.1(9) with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-25-01

On Compliance of Section 286.14 of Latvian Administrative Violations Code with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-01-01

On Compliance of the First Sentence of Para 40 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation of 6 March 2007 No. 173 "Procedures for the Acquisition of Driver Qualification, Procedures for the Acquisition and Renewal of the Right to Drive a Vehicle and Procedures for the Issuance, Change and Renewal of Driving License" with Article 64 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the First Sentence of Section 40 of March 2007 Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No. 173 “Procedures for the Acquisition of Driver Qualification, Procedures for the Acquisition and Renewal of the Right to Drive a Vehicle and Procedures for the Issuance, Change and Renewal of Driving License” does comply with Article 64 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Section 20 of Law On the Judicial Power (in the Wording of 16 June 2009) and the Third Sentence thereof (in the Wording of 1 December 2009,) Insofar as They Establish Remuneration of Land Registry Office Judges, with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the second sentence of Para 20 of Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Judicial Power” and the words “salary of judges shall be calculated at the amount of 73 percent of the labour wage established in accordance with Para 17 of the Transitional Provisions” insofar as they establish remuneration of Land Registry Office judges, do comply with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme provided that from 1 January 2011 salaries would be calculated and disbursed in accordance with Section120.1 of the Law “On Judicial Power” as ruled in the Judgment of 18 January 2010 by the Constitutional Court in the case No. 2009-11-01.

On Compliance of Section 358 and Section 364 of Civil Law with Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the Section 358 and Section 364 of the Civil Law do not comply with Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and shall be null and void as from 1 January 2012.

On Compliance of Para 30 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-29-01

Combined case: 2009-111-01

On Compliance of Para  30 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-29-01

On Compliance of the Words "Public Mortgage" in Para 1 of Section 400(1) of Civil Procedure Law and of the First and the Third Part of Section 405 with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-16-01

On Compliance of Section 286.14 of Latvian Administrative Violations Code with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-01-01

On Compliance of the First and the Third Part of Section 405 of Civil Procedure Law with Article 92of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-16-01

On Compliance of the Words "With Confiscation of Property" in Section 320(2) of Criminal Law (in the Wording of 25 April 2002 of the Law) with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Sub-para 1 of Para 4 of Transitional Provisions of the Maintenance Guarantee Fund Law with Article 1 and Article 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-18-01

On Compliance of Para 30 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pension" with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the Para 30 of Transitional Provisions of the Law “On State Pensions” does comply with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

On Compliance of Sub-para 1 of Para 1 of Transitional provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-20-0106

On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 20 (9) of Law On Compulsory Social Insurance in Respect of Accidents at Work and Occupational Diseases with Article 1, Article 91, Article 105 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-17-01

On Compliance of the Words in Section 396(1) of Civil Procedure Law "or the pledgee who has the right to sell the pledge on the open market", the Words in Section 396(2) "but if the application has been submitted by a pledgee – also a true copy of the pledge agreement, evidence regarding warning of the debtor, unless it does not follow from the law that such warning is required", the Words in Section 397(1) "without notifying the applicant and the debtor thereof", and the words in Para 1 of Section 397(2)"the immovable property is owned by the submitter of the application or by a debtor of a pledgee and the pledgee has the right to sell the immovable property on the open market" with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-08-01

On Compliance of Section 6 of Law Amendments to the Law on Personal Income Tax of 1 December 2009 (Provision Envisaging Deleting Para 3 of Section 9 (1) of Law On Personal Income Tax) and Para 13 of Section 8 (3) and Para 19 of Section 16.1 of Law On Personal Income Tax with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held:
1. Section 6 of the Law “Amendments to the Law on Personal Income Tax” of 1 December 2009 (Provision Envisaging Crossing out of Section 9 (1) (3) of the Law “On Personal Income Tax”) does comply with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
2. Section 8 (3) (13) and Section 16.1 (9) of the Law “On Personal Income Tax” does comply with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.