Search

On Compliance of Para 4 of Section 16(1) of Law On Identity Documents with the First and the Second Sentence of Article 98 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Section 6(1) of Law "Amendments to Law On Compulsory Social Insurance in Respect of Accidents at Work and Occupational Diseases" with Article 1, the First Sentence in Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-17-01

On Compliance of the Part of Spatial Planning for Stopiņi County, in Accordance with the Territory Marked in Annex 1 to the Planning (Territory Between "Ginteri" and "Eģenovas" Named "Composting Field of Ltd. "Getliņi-2"), with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Para 30 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-29-01

On Compliance of Section 59.2, Section 59.3, Section 59.4, Section 117 (4) Para 3, Section 173 (4) and Section 185 (1) Prim of the Credit Institutions Law with Article 1, Article 90, Article 91, Article 92 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Courtheld:
1) proceedings in respect to compliance of Section 592 (3) of the Credit Institutions Law with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia regarding the principle of an independent democratic state shall be terminated;
2) proceedings in respect to compliance of Section 592, Section 593, Section 594, Section 117 (4) indent 3, Section 173 (4) and Section 185 (1) Prim of the Credit Institutions Law with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia shall be terminated;
3) Section 592, Section 593, Section 594, Section 117 (4) indent 3, Section 173 (4) and Section 185 (1) Prim of the Credit Institutions Law do comply with Article 1, Article 90, Article 92 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

On Compliance of Section 16.1 (3) of Law On Personal Income Tax with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the Section 16.1 (3) of the Law “On Personal Income Tax” does comply with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

On Compliance of the Words in Section 396(1) of Civil Procedure Law "or the pledgee who has the right to sell the pledge on the open market", the Words in Section 396(2) "but if the application has been submitted by a pledgee – also a true copy of the pledge agreement, evidence regarding warning of the debtor, unless it does not follow from the law that such warning is required", the Words in Section 397(1) "without notifying the applicant and the debtor thereof", and the words in Para 1 of Section 397(2)"the immovable property is owned by the submitter of the application or by a debtor of a pledgee and the pledgee has the right to sell the immovable property on the open market" with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Para 1.1 of Regulation by the Cabinet of Ministers of 2 June 2009 No. 511 "Amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation of 24 August 2004 No. 740 "Regulation on Grants""with Article 91 and Article 112 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of the Part in the Binding Regulation of 24 September 2009 No. 9 by the Council of Pāvilosta County "On Spatial Planning of Pāvilosta County", Consisting of the Graphic Part "Planned (Permitted) Use of Territory" in the Binding Regulation of 27December 2007 by the Council of Saka Parish No. 12 "Regulation on the Use of and Construction in the Territory of Saka Paris, Saka County", Insofar it Applies to Parts of Zaļkalna Forest to the Parts of Akmeņraga Forest Adjacent to the Nature Protection Zone "Ziemupe", with Article 115 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Section 7 (5) of Investigatory Operations Law with Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, Article 13 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well a compliance of the First Sentence of Section 35 (1) of Investigatory Operations Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held:
1) Section 7 (5) of the Investigatory Operations Law does comply with Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia;
2) Section 7 (5) of the Investigatory Operations Law and the first sentence of Section 35 (1) of the Investigatory Operations Law does comply with Article 13 of the European Convention of the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
3) the first sentence of Section 35 (1) of the Investigatory Operations Law does comply with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

On Compliance of the Binding Regulations of 29 September 2009 No. 4 by the Council of Grobiņa County "On Approving the Spatial Plalning of the Former Local Governments Belonging to Grobiņa County", which Approved the Binding Regulations of 4 June 2009 by the Council of Medze Parish No. 3/09 "The Graphic Part of the Spatial Planning for Medze Paris and the Regulation on the Use of and Construction in the Territory", in the Part Establishing a Zone for Harvesting Wind Eenergy within the Territory of Medze Parish, and the Binding Regulations of 18 February 2010 No. 62 "Detail Plan for the Property "Papardes" in Medze Parish" with Article 105 and Article 115 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of the Binding Regulations of 17 December 2009 by the Council of Rucava County No. 41 "Detail Planning for the Immoveable Property Šuķi" (Cad.No. 6452 012 0156, Cad.No. 6452 011 0012), "Skrandas" (Cad.No. 6452 012 0007)" with Article 105 and Article 115 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-48-03

On Compliance of Sub-para 44.4 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation of 30 May 2006 No. 423 "Internal Rules of Procedure of an Institution for Deprivation of Liberty" with Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Article 10 (5) (6) of Law On the Rights of Patients, insofar as It Fails to Establish the Right of the State Audit Office to Request Necessary Information Regarding a Patient for the Performance of the Functions Specified by the Law with Article 1, Article 87, and Article 88 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the Section 10 (5) (6) of the Law on the Rights of Patients does comply with Article 1, Article 87 and Article 88 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

On Compliance of Annex I to the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation of 30 May 2006 No. 423 "Internal Rules of Procedure of an Institution for Deprivation of Liberty", Insofar it Does not Envisage Possession of Religious Objects, with Article 99 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the First Appendix of 30 May 2006 Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 423 “Regulations of Internal Procedure in Imprisonment Establishments” insofar as it regulates keeping of religious objects does not comply with Article 99 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and shall be null and void as from 1 October 2011.

On Compliance of Para 30 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation of 25 August 2008 No. 692 "Regulations on Consumer Credit "with Article 64 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of the Binding Regulation of 3 November 2009 by the Council of Rucava County No. 27 “On Spatial Plans of Rucava County” in the Part of Establishing Wind Energy Zone in the Territory of Dunika Parish and the Binding Regulation of 17 December 2009 No. 41 “Detail Planning for the Immoveable Property “Šuķi” (Cadastre Reg. No. 6452 012 0156, Cad. No. 6452 011 0012), “Skrandas” (Cad. No. 6452 012 0007)” with Article 105 and Article 115 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held to recognise the Binding Regulation of 3 November 2009 by the Council of Rucava County No. 27 “On Spatial Plans of Rucava County” in the Part of Establishing Wind Energy Zone in the Territory of Dunika Parish and the Binding Regulation of 17 December 2009 No. 41 “Detail Planning for the Immoveable Property “Šuķi” (Cadastre Reg. No. 6452 012 0156, Cad. No. 6452 011 0012), “Skrandas” (Cad. No. 6452 012 0007) as being compatible with Article 105 and Article 115 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

On Compliance of Section 9 of the Law of 14 June 2007 "Amendments to Law On the Completion of Land Reform in Rural Areas" in the Part, by Which Para 1 of Section 10(1) of Law on the Completion of Land Reform in Rural Areas is Expressed in a Different Wording, with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of the Words in Section 396(1) of Civil Procedure Law "or the pledgee who has the right to sell the pledge on the open market", the Words in Section 396(2) "but if the application has been submitted by a pledgee – also a true copy of the pledge agreement, evidence regarding warning of the debtor, unless it does not follow from the law that such warning is required", the Words in Section 397(1) "without notifying the applicant and the debtor thereof", and the words in Para 1 of Section 397(2)"the immovable property is owned by the submitter of the application or by a debtor of a pledgee and the pledgee has the right to sell the immovable property on the open market" with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-43-01

On Compliance of Section 14(7) and Section 20(9) of Law On Compulsory Social Insurance in Respect of Accidents at Work and Occupational Diseases", of Section 20(9) of Law On Compulsory Social Insurance in Respect of Accidents at Work and Occupational Diseases (in the Wording of the Law That Was Effective from 25 November 2004 to 16 June 2009) and Section 6(1) of Law "Amendments to Law "On Compulsory Social Insurance in Respect of Accidents at Work and Occupational Diseases"" with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2010-17-01