Search

Filter results

  • Years
  • 39
  • 33
  • 47
  • 45
  • 45
  • 66
  • 38
  • 25
  • 35
  • 31
  • 25
  • 36
  • 21
  • 26
  • 21
  • 75
  • 117
  • 48
  • 26
  • 43
  • 25
  • 26
  • 23
  • 21
  • 17
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • More
  • Stages of the proceedings
  • 19
  • 6
  • More
  • Outcome of the proceedings
  • 14
  • 5
  • 6
  • More
  • Type of the proceedings
  • 17
  • 2
  • 6
  • More
Results: 25
Print
Case No 2015-05-03
On Compliance of Para 100 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No. 262 of 16 March 2010 "Regulations Regarding the Production of Electricity Using Renewable Energy Sources and the Procedures for the Determination of the Price" with Article 64 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Augstākās tiesas Administratīvo lietu departaments
14.10.2015.

15.10.2015.

On Compliance of Para 100 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No. 262 of 16 March 2010 "Regulations Regarding the Production of Electricity Using Renewable Energy Sources and the Procedures for the Determination of the Price" with Article 64 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Suspension of the Mandatory Electricity Procurement

The Constitutional Court recognised the contested norm as being compatible with Article 64 of the Satversme.

Case No 2015-03-01
On Compliance of Section 2 of the Law of 25 September 2014 "Amendments to Insolvency Law" and the Law of 30 October 2014 "Amendments to Law on Prevention of Conflict of Interest in Activities of Public Officials" with Article 1 and the First Sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Madara Volksone, Dāvis Volksons, Lelde Švāģere, Ivo Svāģers, Evija Novicāne, Kaspars Novicāns un Vija Ritenberga
21.12.2015.

23.12.2015.

On Compliance of Section 2 of the Law of 25 September 2014 "Amendments to Insolvency Law" and the Law of 30 October 2014 "Amendments to Law on Prevention of Conflict of Interest in Activities of Public Officials" with Article 1 and the First Sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Insolvency Administrators as Officials and also - Advocates

The Constitutional Court held :

to recognise Section 2 of the law of 25 September 2014 “Amendments to the Insolvency Law” and the law of 30 October 2014 “Amendments to the Law on Prevention of Conflict of Interest in the Activities of Public Officials”, to the extent they do not ensure to administrators of insolvency proceedings, who are simultaneously also advocates, guarantees for professional activities for retaining the chosen employment, as being incompatible with the first sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

Case No 2015-04-01
On Compliance of Section 2 of the Law "Amendments to the Insolvency Law" of 25 September 2014 and the Law "Amendments to the Law On Prevention of Conflict of Interest in Activities of Public Officials" of 30 October 2014 with Article 1 and the First Sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Uldis Bērziņš, Linda Sniega-Svilāne un Santa Strode
22.02.2016.

24.02.2016.

On Compliance of Section 2 of the Law "Amendments to the Insolvency Law" of 25 September 2014 and the Law "Amendments to the Law On Prevention of Conflict of Interest in Activities of Public Officials" of 30 October 2014 with Article 1 and the First Sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: Insolvency Administrators as Public Officials and, Simultaneously, tax Consultants, Members of a Company's Board

On 22 February 2016 the Constitutional Court adopted a decision to terminate legal proceedings in Case No. 2015-04-01 “On Compliance of Section 2 of the Law “Amendments to the Insolvency Law” of 25 September 2014 and the Law “Amendments to the Law On Prevention of Conflict of Interest in the Activities of Public Officials” of 30 October 2014 with Article 1 and the first sentence of Article 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.”

Case No 2015-02-01
On Compliance of Section 8(1) of Law on Control of Aid for Commercial Activity with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Joined
Viktors Krasovickis
16.01.2015.
-
-
-
-

-

On Compliance of Section 8(1) of Law on Control of Aid for Commercial Activity with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2014-36-01

Case No 2015-01-01
On Compliance of the First and the Second Part of Section 7 of Law on the National Flag of Latvia and Section 201.43 of Latvian Administrative Violations Code with Article 100 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Solvita Olsena
02.07.2015.

06.07.2015.

On Compliance of the First and the Second Part of Section 7 of Law on the National Flag of Latvia and Section 201.43 of Latvian Administrative Violations Code with Article 100 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Flags

Constitutional Court held:
1. To recognise the first and the second part of Section 7 of Law on the National Flag of Latvia as being compatible with Article 100 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
2. To recognise Section 20143 of the Latvian Administrative Violations Code, insofar it established penalty for failure to place the Latvian national flag on residential buildings owned by private persons in accordance with the first and the second part of Section 7 of Law on the National Flag of Latvia, as being incompatible with Article 100 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

Cookies

For the website to function, mandatory cookies are used.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie ensures the website's proper functioning by providing its basic functions. The website will not be able to function properly without these cookies.

Analytics Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Social media cookies

With your consent, social media cookies may additionally be used on this website. These cookies are set by other companies whose functionality is used by the website.