Search

On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2006-10-03

On Compliance of the Provision of Para 1 of Section(1) of Law on State Social Allowances – “if this person is not employed (is not considered to be an employee or self-employed person in accordance with Law on State Social Insurance) ” with Articles 91 Article 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2006-08-01

On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2006-10-03

On Compliance of Para 8 and Para 9 of Transitory Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 1, Article 91 and Article  109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Para 3 of the Regulation No. 272 of August 15, 2000 by the Cabinet of Ministers on Amendments to Law On Service Pensions for Military Persons Section 3 of the November 30, 2000 Law on Amendments to Law On Service Pensions for Military Persons and May 25, 2006 Law on Amendments to Law On Service Pensions for Military Persons with the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court ruled:
1. To declare Item 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers August 15, 2000 Regulations No. 272 ”Amendments to the Military Persons’ Term of Service Pension Law”, Section 3 of November 30, 2000 Law ”Amendments to the Military Persons’ Term of Service Pension Law” and May 25, 2006 Law ”An Amendment to the Military Persons’ Term of Service Pension Law” as unconformable with Section 91 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void from July 1, 2007.
2. As regards those military persons whom – when calculating term of service pensions – the period till August 19, 2009 was taken into consideration, including the calculation of term of service pensions for this time to declare Item 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers August 15, 2000 Regulations No. 272 ”Amendments to Military Persons’ Term of Service Pension Law” and May 25, 2006 Law ”Amendments to Military Persons’ Term of Service Pension Law” as unconformable with Sections 1 and 91 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void as from the day of their adoption. In this case Section 5, Paragraph 2 of the Military Persons’ Term of Service Pension Law is in effect in the wording in which it was valid till the day of Regulations No. 272 taking effect.

On Compliance of Section 1(1), Section 4(1), Section 6(3), Section 22 and Section 50 of Public Prosecutor’s Office Law with Article 1, Article 58, Article 82, Article 86 and Article 90 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court ruled to declare Section 1, Paragraph 1; Section 4, Paragraph 1; Section 6, Paragraph 3; Sections 22 and 50 of the Office of the Prosecutor Law as conformable with Sections 1, 58, 82, 86 and 90 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme.

On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2006-10-03

On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court ruled to declare Item 3.1. of the Cabinet of Ministers December 7, 2004 Regulations No. 1003 ”On the Procedure under which the Allowance for Childcare and Additional Payment for Twins or Several Children Born in One Confinement shall be Granted and Paid” and words ”and not more than 392 lats per month”, which are Included in Item 2.2 of the Cabinet of Ministers August 8, 2006 Regulations No. 644 ”Regulations on the Amount of Childcare Allowance and Additional Payment for Twins or Several Children Born in One Confinement as well as on the Procedure for Revision of it and Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Additional Payment” as Conformable with Section 91 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme.

On Compliance of Part of Spatial Plan of the Garkalne Parish Providing for Building on the Flooding Area of Lielais Baltezers with Article 1 and Article 115 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court ruled to declare the part of the Garkalne Pagasts Spatial Plan for 2004 – 2016, which envisages construction of buildings on the flood zone of the Big Baltezers Lake as unconformable with Section 115 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void from January 5, 2005.

On Compliance of the Provision “if This Person was not Been Employed (is not Deemed to Be an Employee or Self-Employed Person in Accordance with the Law on State Social Insurance)” of Section 7.1 of Law On State Social Allowances with Articles 91 and 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held to recognize the provision contained in the first part of Section 71 of the Law On The State Social Allowances - “if the referred to person is not employed (is not deemed to be an employee or self-employed person in accordance with the Law on State Social Insurance)” to be in conflict with Section 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia” and invalid from January 1, 2006.

On Compliance of that Paragraph of Section 1 of the Law “Amendments to the Law on State Social Allowances” by which a new paragraph - Para 3 of Section 7(1) into the State Social Allowances Law, as well as the Compliance of its Section 2 with Article 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitution al Court ruled:
1. To declare part of Section 1 of the Law ”Amendments to the State Social Allowances Law” by which a new Item – Item 3 – has been included in the State Social Allowances Law as conformable with Section 110 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme.
2. To declare Section 2 of the Law ”Amendments to the State Social Allowances Law” by which Section 15 of the State Social Allowances Law has been supplemented with a new – the sixth Paragraph, as unconformable with Section 91 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void as of March 1, 2007.

On Compliance of Sub-para 12 of Para 16 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2006-04-01

On Compliance of the Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth part of Section 46 of Radio and Television Law with Article 58 and Article91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court ruled to declare Section 46 – Paragraphs six, seven, eight and nine - of the Radio and Television Law as conformable with Sections 58 and 91 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme.

On Compliance of Paragraph 16, Subparagraph 12 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions Transitional Provisions with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court ruled to declare Paragraph 16, Subparagraph 12 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law ”On State Pensions” as conformable with Sections 1, 91 and 109 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme.

On the Compliance of the Words ”or other means” and ”as well as orally expressed various addresses, slogans or speeches" in Section 1(4) , Section 9(1), the words "keepers of public order" in Para 1 Section 12(3), the words "and pedestrians" of Section 13(2), the second sentence in Section 14(6), the words "not earlier than 10 days" of Section 15(4), Section 16 and Section 18(4) of Law On Meetings, Processions and Pickets 4 with Article 103 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme, Article 11 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as with Article 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Constitutional Court ruled:
1. To declare words ” or other attributes” and ”or addresses”, which are incorporated into Section 1, Paragraph 4 of the Law ”On Meetings, Processions and Pickets” as well as the words ”and pedestrians”, included in Section 13, Paragraph 3 as conformable with Section 103 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme, Section 11 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Section 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
2. To declare the words ”as well as verbally expressed separate slogans, exclamations”, which are included in Section 1, Paragraph 4; Paragraph 1 of Section 9; the words ”keepers of public order”, which are included in Section 12, Paragraph 3, Item 1; the second sentence of Section 14, Paragraph 6 and Paragraph 4 of Section 18 of the Law ”On Meetings, Processions and Pickets” as unconformable with Section 103 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme, Section 11 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as well as with Section 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and null and void as of the moment of publishing of the Judgment.
3. To declare the words ”not earlier than 10 days and not later than 48 hours before the beginning of the activity”, which are incorporated into Section 15, Paragraph 4 of the Law ”On Meetings, Processions and Pickets” as unconformable with Section 103 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme if being read in conjunction with Section 92 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void from the moment of publishing of the Judgment.
4. To declare Sections 15 and 17 of the Law ”On Meetings, Processions and Pickets” as unconformable with Section 103 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme, Section 11 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Section 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and null and void from June 1, 2007.
5. To determine that till June 1, 2007 the norms of Chapter III of the Law ”On Meetings, Processions and Pickets” shall be applied in accordance with Section 103 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme.

On Compliance of Section 42 of Law on Gambling and Lotteries with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and the First Part of Article 3 and the Third, the Fourth and the Fifth Part of Article 4 of European Charter of Local Self-Governments

On Compliance of Para5 of Section 5 of The Saeima Election Law with Article 9, Article 91 and Article100 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, as well as Article 25 and Article 26 of International pact of Civil and Political Rights

Combined case: 2005-13-0106

On the Compliance of Section 13(1) of April 7, 2004 Law Amendments to the Law On the Privatization of State and Local Governments Apartment Houses” with Article 91 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme

Constitutional Court ruled:
1. To declare Section 13, the first Paragraph of the April 7, 2004 Law ”Amendments to the Law ” On the Privatization of State and Local Government Apartment Houses”” as unconformable with Section 91 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void from the moment of its passing.
2. To determine that Section 74, the fifth Paragraph of the Law ”On the Privatization of State and Local Government Apartment Houses” is valid in the wording, in which it was in effect till the moment of adoption of April 7, 2004 Law ”Amendments to the Law ”On Privatization of State and Local Government Apartment Houses””.

On the Compliance of Para 8 of Section 5(3) of Law On Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau with the First Part of Article 101 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court ruled to declare Section 5 (Item 8 of the third Paragraph) of the Law on Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau as conformable with the first Part of Section 101 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme.

On Compliance of Para 8 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation of 28 September 2004 "Regulations on the System of Remuneration for Work to Health Care Employees and Specialists of Social Work of Institutions Financed from the State Budget" with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia