Search
Filter results
- Years
- 7
- 47
- 45
- 45
- 66
- 38
- 25
- 35
- 31
- 25
- 36
- 21
- 26
- 21
- 75
- 117
- 48
- 26
- 43
- 25
- 26
- 23
- 21
- 17
- 8
- 7
- 6
- 5
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 12
- 4
- 4
- 542
- 346
- 7
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 415
- 123
- 210
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 445
- 103
- 155
- 212
- More
On Compliance of the Words “not More than LVL 392” of the Provision Included in Para 2.2 of Regulation No. 644 of 8 August 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-24-03
On Compliance of the Words “not More than LVL 392” of the Provision Included in Para 2.2 of Regulation No. 644 of 8 August 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-24-03
On Compliance of the Words “not More than LVL 392” of the Provision Included in Para 2.2 of the Regulation No. 644 of 8 August 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-24-03
On Compliance of the Words “not More than LVL 392” of the Provision Included in Para 2.2 of the Cabinet Regulation No. 644 of 8 August 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-24-03
On Compliance of Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of Regulation Nr. 1003 of 7 December 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-24-03
On Compliance of the Words “not More than LVL 392” of the Provision Included in Para 2.2 of the Regulation No. 644 of 8 August 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-24-03
On Compliance of the Second Part of Section 55 of the Sentence Execution Code with Article 91 and 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: Deductions from the Convicted Persons' Remuneration for WorkConstitutional court held:
1. The second part of Article 55 of the Code on the Execution of Sentences of the Republic of Latvia is in conflict with Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
2. The second part of Article 55 of the Code on the Execution of Sentences of the Republic of Latvia is in conflict with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and invalid from December 15, 2007.
On Compliance of Para 23.5 of the Regulation No. 746 of 24 August 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers "Regulations on Work Remuneration for Teachers" with Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: The Teachers' RemunerationConstitutional Court held Paragraph 23.1 of the Regulation No. 746 of the Cabinet of Ministers of August 24, 2004 “Regulations On Work Remuneration of Teachers” comply with Section 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
On Compliance of Para 5 of the Transitional Provisions of State Civil Service Law and Regulation of February 20, 2001 by the Cabinet of Ministers No. 79 “Regulations on the Procedure and the Term for Applying the Mandatory Requirement Set for Civil Servants – Higher Education” with Articles 1, 91, 101 and 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: The Dismissal of Civil Servants from OfficeConstitutional court held:
1. Para 5 of the Transitional Provisions of the State Civil Service Law complies with Articles 1, 91, 101 and 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
2. Paras 1 – 6 and Paras 8 – 10 of the Regulation of February 20, 2001 by the Cabinet of Ministers No. 79 “Regulations on Application Order and Term of the Mandatory Requirement for Civil Servants – Higher Education” comply with Articles 1, 91, 101 and 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
3. Para 7 of the Regulation of February 20, 2001 by the Cabinet of Ministers No. 79 “Regulations on Application Order and Term of the Mandatory Requirement for Civil Servants – Higher Education” complies with Articles 1, 91, 101 and 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia if it is related to the persons mentioned in Para 4 of the Concluding Part of the Judgment.
4. As to the persons who initiated studies in an institution of higher education and discontinued them due to relevant and justifying conditions, Para 7 of the Regulation of February 20, 2001 by the Cabinet of Ministers No. 79 “Regulations on Application Order and Term of the Mandatory Requirement for Civil Servants – Higher Education” is in conflict with Articles 1, 91, 101 and 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and invalid as of the day of coming into force.
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Section 22 of Law On Personal Income Tax with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: The Amount of Personal Income TaxConstitutional Court held:
1. to recognize the second sentence of the fourth part of Section 22 of the Law “On Personal Income Tax” to be in conflict with Section 92 of the Satverme of the Republic of Latvia and invalid as of October 1, 2007.
2. In regard to the administrative cases, which have been initiated prior to the date of publishing this judgment of the Constitutional Court, recognize the second sentence of the fourth part of Section 22 of the Law “On Personal Income Tax” to be in conflict with Section 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and invalid as of the date of the judgment taking effect.
On Compliance of Sub-para 3 of Para 3 of Regulation No. 740 of August 24, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers "Regulations On Grants" and Sub-para 2 of Para 2 of the Statutes of the University of Latvia “On Allocation of Grants Funded by the State Budget of the University of Latvia” with Articles 91, 106 and 112 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-24-03
On Compliance of the Words “not More than LVL 392” of the Provision Included in Para 2.2 of the Regulation No. 644 of August 8, 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-24-03
On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of 7 December 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers "Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed" and Para 2.2 of the Regulation No. 644 of 8 August 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers "Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement" with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
On Compliance of the Words “not More than LVL 392” of the Provision Included in Para 2.2 of the Regulation No. 644 of August 8, 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-10-03
On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-10-03
On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-10-03
On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-10-03
On Compliance of the Words “not More than LVL 392” of the Provision Included in Para 2.2 of the Regulation No. 644 of August 8, 2006 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-10-03
On Compliance of the Words “and not More than LVL 392 per Month” of the Provision Included in Para 3.1 of the Regulation Nr. 1003 of December 7, 2004 by the Cabinet of Ministers, Procedures by Which the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery Shall be Granted and Disbursed with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2006-10-03