Search
Filter results
- Years
- 1
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 1
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 1
- More
Results: 1
Print
Case No 2019-13-01
On Compliance of Section 464 (41) of the Civil Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Adjudicated
Sandra Pīlāte
Show all
On Compliance of Section 464 (41) of the Civil Procedure Law with the First Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: Refusal to Initiate Cassation proceedings in Civil Procedure without statement of reasonsThe Constitutional Court held:
to recognise Section 464 (4 1) of the Civil Procedure Law, insofar it applied to the decision on the refusal to initiate cassation legal proceedings, as being compatible with the first sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
-
The norm that provides that the decision to refuse initiation of cassation legal proceedings in a civil case may be drawn up in the form of a resolution complies with the Satversme
-
A case initiated with respect to a norm that provides that in civil procedure the Senate’s decision to refuse initiation of cassation legal proceedings may be drawn up in the form of a resolution