Search
Filter results
- Years
- 7
- 47
- 45
- 45
- 66
- 38
- 25
- 35
- 31
- 25
- 36
- 21
- 26
- 21
- 75
- 117
- 48
- 26
- 43
- 25
- 26
- 23
- 21
- 17
- 8
- 7
- 6
- 5
- More
- Stages of the proceedings
- 12
- 3
- 5
- 542
- 346
- 7
- More
- Outcome of the proceedings
- 415
- 123
- 210
- More
- Type of the proceedings
- 445
- 103
- 155
- 212
- More
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Para 7 of Transitional Provisions of Law On Judicial Power (in the Wording of the Law of 14 November 2008) with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2009-11-01
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Para 7 of Transitional Provisions of Law On Judicial Power (in the Wording of the Law of 14 November 2008) with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2009-11-01
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Para 7 of Transitional Provisions of Law On Judicial Power (in the Wording of the Law of 14 November 2008) with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2009-11-01
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Para 7 of Transitional Provisions of Law On Judicial Power (in the Wording of the Law of 14 November 2008) with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2009-11-01
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Para 7 of Transitional Provisions of Law On Judicial Power (in the Wording of the Law of 14 November 2008) with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2009-11-01
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Para 7 of Transitional Provisions of Law On Judicial Power (in the Wording of the Law of 14 November 2008) with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Combined case: 2009-11-01
On Compliance of Section 30(1) of Electricity Market Law with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
On Compliance of the Third Sentence of Section 10 (3) of Law On Religious Organizations with Article 99 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and Article 9 of the European Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
On Compliance of the Words "the Reimbursement of Expenditures for the Acquisition of Medicinal Products and Medicinal Devices" of the Second Sentence of Para 92, the Words "Except for the Case Referred to in Sub-Paragraph 100.1" of Para 94, the Words "not More than LVL 10 000 for One Patient within a Time Period of 12 Months" of Para 100 and the Second Sentence of Para 100.1 of the 31 October 2006 Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 899 ""Procedures for the Reimbursement of Expenditures for the Acquisition of Medicinal Products and Medicinal Devices Intended for Out-patient Medical Treatment"" with Article 93 and Article 110 of the Satversme (Constitution) of the Republic of Latvia
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Para 7 and Para 17 of Transitional Provisions of Law On Judicial Power (in the Wording of the Law of 14 November 2008) with Article 1, Article 83 and Article 107 of the Satversme (Constitution) of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: The Judges' Salaries IConstitutional Court held:
1. To declare the second sentence of Paragraph 7 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Judicial Power”, in the wording of the law from 14 November, 2008, 16 June, 2009 and 1 December, 2009 incompatible with Article 83 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and invalid starting with 1 January, 2011.
2. To declare Paragraph 17 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law “On Judicial power”, in the wording of the law from 14 November, 2008, 16 June, 2009 and 1 December, 2009 incompatible with Article 83 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and invalid starting with 1 January, 2011.
On Compliance of the Second Part of Section 49 of Sentence Execution Code of Latvia with Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Constitutional Court held that the Second Part of Section 49 of the Latvian Sentence Execution Code does not comply with Article 96 of the Satversme.
On Compliance of the Graphic Part of the Riga City Council Binding Regulations of 20 December 2005 No. 34 "Provisions on the Use of and Construction in the Territory of Riga" that Provides for Inclusion of the Land Parcel of Kanāla Street n/n (Cadastre No. 01001281003) into the Greenery and Nature Territory with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and Para 6 of Section 3 of Spatial Planning Law
On Compliance of the Words "State Pensions Shall Not Be Revised in 2009" of Section 2 of Law "On Amendments to Law On State Pensions" of 12 March 2009 with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: The Non-revision of PensionsConstitutional Court held that the words “State pensions shall not be examined in 2009” of Section 2 of 12 March 2009 Law “Amendments to the Law “On State Pensions” comply with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
On Compliance of Section 74 (1) of Sentence Execution Code of Latvia and Para 88 of the 30 May 2006 Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No. 432 "Internal Rules of Procedure of an Institution for Deprivation of Liberty" with Article 96 and Article 104 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Constitutional Court held:
1. Section 74 (1) of the Latvian Penalty Execution code and Section 88 of 30 May 2006 Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 423 “Regulations Regarding Internal Rules of Order of Places of Deprivation of Liberty” (the wording of 12 May 2009 Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 413) comply with Article 96 and Article 104 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
2. Proceedings in the case regarding compliance of Section 88 of 30 May 2006 Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 423 “Regulations Regarding Internal Rules of Order of Places of Deprivation of Liberty” (the wording of 3 June 2006) with Article 104 of the Satversme shall be terminated.
On Compliance of the Law "On Forfeit of Property for Public Needs, for the Third Stage of Construction of the Southern Bridge" with Article 105 of the Satversme (Constitution) of the Republic of Latvia
On Compliance of the Words "Two" and "per Month" of Para 4 of Section 50.4(8) of the Sentence Execution Code of Latvia with Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Constitutional Court held that the words "two" and "per month" of Item 4 of Part 8 of Section 50.4 of the Penalty Execution Code of Latvia complies with Article 96 of the Satversme (Constitution) of the Republic of Latvia.
On Compliance of the Words "Dzērbenes Parish" and "Kaives Parish, Taurenes Parish" of Para 103 of Appendix 2 "Amalgamated Municipalities and Entities of Territorial Division Thereof" of Law On Administrative Territories and Populated Areas with Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Government of 15 October 1985
On Compliance of the Amount of Toilet Soap Provided for in Appendix 3 of the 19 December 2006 Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 1022 ""Regulations on Norms Regarding Nourishment and Material Provision of Everyday Needs" with Article 91 and Article 111 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
On Compliance of the Words "One Hour Long" and "in the Presence of a Representative of an Investigation Prison Administration" of Para 6 of Section 13 of Law On the Procedures for Holding under Arrest with Article 96 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 1 of Law On Confiscation of Immovable Property for the Needs of the Border Checkpoint Terehova with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: The Expropriation of Immoveable Property. (The Border Checkpoint Terehova)Constitutional Court held that the Item 1 of Section 1 of the Law “On Expropriation of Immovable Property for the Needs of the Border Checkpoint Terehova” does not comply with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and shall be void as from the moment of adopting thereof.