Search

On Compliance of the Words "Baloži Town" of Para 44 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 "Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments" with Article 1 and Article 101 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2008-25-03

On Compliance of the Words "Inčukalns Parish" of Para 3.16 and Para 77 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 "Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments" with Article 1 and Article 101 of the Satversme (Constitution) of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2008-25-03

On Compliance of the Words "Jersika Parish" of Para 48 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 "Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments" with Article 1 and Article 101 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2008-25-03

Of the Words “Lapmežciema Parish” in Para 3.15, the Words "Inčukalna Parish of Para 3.16, of the Words "Valgunde County" of Para 3.17, the Words of Para 2 in Annexx II "Skrīveri County", the Words "Brīvzemnieki Parish" of Para 5, the Words "Bēne Parish" of Para 8, the Words “Baltinava Parish” of Para 12, the Words “Code Parish"”, “Gailīši Parish”, “Īslīce Parish”, “Mežotne Parish” and “Vecsaule Parish” of Para 13, the Words “Kauguri Parish” of Para 14, the Words “Amata Parish” and“Drabeši Parish” of Para 18, the Words “Lapmežciems Parish” of Para 25, the Words “Valgunde County”, “Glūda Parish” and “Līvbērze Parish” of Para 35, the Words “Baloži Town” of Para 44 , the Words “Jersika Parish” of Para 48, the Words “Priekuļi Parish” of Para 65, the Words “Malta Parish” of Para 66, the words “Allaži Parish”, “Inčukalns Parish” “Sigulda Town”, “Sigulda Parish” and “More Parish” of Para 77, the Words “Ģibuļi Parish”, “Lībagu Parish” and “Strazdes Parish of Para 82”, the Words“Pūre Parish” of Para 84, the Words“Kocēni Parish" of Para 87, the Words “Tārgale Parish of Para 92 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 "Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments" with Article 1 and Article 101 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of the Part of the Riga Spatial Plan for 2006 – 2018, which Provides that the Territory Between A. Deglava Street, Lubāna Street, the Constructed Extension of A. Deglava Street up to Kaive Street and the Planned Rembate Street is the Land of Mixed Type Construction, with Article 1 and 115 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of the Binding Regulations of the Jūrmala City Council of December 1, 2004 No. 22 "On Confirmation of the Binding Part of the Draft Detail Plan "Bulduri 1001"" with Article 115 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of the Words “Vaidava Parish” of Para 87 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 and Article 101 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of the Words “Skrīveri Parish” of Para 2, the Words “Bēne Parish” of Para 8, the Words “Baltinava Parish” of Para 12, the Words “Code Parish”, “Gailīši Parish”, “Īslīce Parish”, “Mežotne Parish” and “Vecsaule Parish” of Para 13, the Words “Kauguri Parish” of Para 14, the Words “Glūda Parish” and “Līvbērze Parish” of Para 35, the Words “Priekuļi Parish” of Para 65, the Words “Malta Parish” of Para 66, the Words “Allaži Parish” of Para 77, the Words “Ģibuļi Parish”, “Lībagi Parish” and “Strazde Parish” of Para 82, the Words “Pūre Parish” of Para 84, the Words “Kocēni Parish” of Para 87 and the Words “Ance Parish” and “Tārgale Parish” of Para 92 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of the Words “Inčukalns Parish” of Para 3.16 and Para 77 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of the Words “Jersika Parish” of Para 48 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article 4 and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of the Words “Baloži Town” of Para 44 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article 4 and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of the Words “Brīvzemnieki Parish” of Para 5 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article 4 and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of the Words “Amata Parish” and “Drabeši Parish” of Para 18 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article 4 and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On the Words “Lapmežciems Parish” of Para 3.15 and Para 25 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article 4 and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of the Words “Valgunde Parish” of Para 3.17 and Para 35 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article 4 and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of the Words “Sigulda City”, “Sigulda Parish” and “More Parish” of Para 77 of Chapter II of the Appendix of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulations of September 4, 2007 No. 596 “Regulations Regarding Administrative Territorial Division of Local Governments” with Article 1 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia, the Third and the Sixth Part of Article 4 and Article 5 of the European Charter of Local Self-Governments of October 15, 1985 and the First and the Fourth part of Section 6.1 of the Law on Administrative Territorial Reform

Combined case: 2008-08-0306

On Compliance of Section 142(2) and Section 284(2) of Commercial Law with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court helds that the second part of Section 284 of the Commercial Law in the wording that was valid before 21 January 2009 insofar as it prohibited establishing, in articles of association of a company, a larger number of votes necessary for adoption of important decisions regarding the stock company "Latvijas Gāze" does not comply with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia from the moment of adoption of this norm.

On Compliance of Para 2 Section 1231 of Civil Law with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that Item 2 of Section 1231 of the Civil Law complies with Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

On Compliance of Section 49 (4) of Criminal Law with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

On Compliance of Section 230.1(1) of Criminal Law with the First Sentence of the First Part of Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 64 and 65 and the Second Sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the first part of Section 230.1 of the Criminal Law complies with Article 64, Article 65 and the second sentence of Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and the first sentence of the first part of Article 7 of the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.